On 08/24/2012 01:48 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 08/22/2012 06:13 PM, Richard Farina wrote:
>> This version of the patch addresses the concerns from Matt (of me
>> failing to copy and paste everything) as well as updates the commit
>> message to show that I have no verified this should work on all gentoo
>> supported platforms.
>>
>> Please accept.
> 
> Quoted patches are no fun.  Attach the patch or make the whole mail work
> with git-am, please please please.

I specifically sent the patch using git-email then replied to my post to
add more detail than the commit message. This is the process I use on
kernel mailing lists and never had a complaint.  If this is not
acceptable please let me know, but I have a feeling that you read my
reply and not the first email that came through....
> 
> To be fair, I should mention that I hav no capacities for testing this
> myself these days.  Hopefully someone else does.  Increased chances for
> easy patch access ;-)

Obviously I have tested the patch, but given that it falls back to the
original behavior (also tested) it's not a very dangerous patch to apply
even without extensive testing imho.

Thanks,
Zero

Reply via email to