On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 06:54:28AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 28 December 2013 01:11:08 Brian Dolbec wrote: > > I don't know if catalyst can do that or not and whether it can > > detect it to run perl-cleaner. > > catalyst certainly could grow code for handling perl-cleaner & > friends.
This sounds like a job for Portage and @preserved-rebuild ;). It has already absorbed revdep-rebuild. Hopefully absorbing perl-cleaner, python-updater, and similar is just a matter of time :p. Cheers, Trevor -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
