-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/31/2013 12:15 PM, W. Trevor King wrote: > On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 05:08:56PM +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: >> To "correct" my previous e-mail, I say we use this version, not the >> one I replied to before. > > Works for me, but I think we should give Zero a bit more time to ack > it too, since he was interested in reviewing up to v3, but hasn't > chimed in yet on v6. > Sorry, been a really miserable holiday, personally and professionally. Yes, ACK, this is much better than the current and I think explains it very well.
- -Zero > Cheers, > Trevor > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSwz2JAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKCL0QAJxCX4/IMY/OUkVWSdyU3EG2 aZ9B12FY3f339x286mhvXEorH0HpLW6tHEBoh03KZruNZrlzOVqxxmtxtFrdgJmd vZjFQjaTQ+bKmWi8oAIvIM3s38Y88r6OD+sONSF8yCE8tlo2vhNQVV5wuKgQTAXz dI7wyvGB5VvBRRg/tGGA0tP/vnG7DnDHqt+5+VMrs+/NcEaBXgT9FgrKuutuu0uP 5p0zzK5nQ8HxRVk1IwEIjdaykpD2FNHP9N12Yadhre2G4E+bqQD/jlDnHvGkwLmf bU9Mr2KfCUJ7yYXMf+wZ/iz+b/gVYrCLR7yfu67kpB+4Qe0Cu98qrm7dJKBlpsh8 bWOl9uzh9XMziU7sRCuUG9oyTZl2aXPeZGleHDDGF0tjKqNIDr41PpG5NBtAex7d dnViekuwlC4utMd1+tHB/8cgi1QghuXNCZjqnwyddF8STkZDKorxaFdeEjTrwwoG o/X+1H1qIVNxd76LZ4XMN/uja7lQJx8BDI/f9kWsxCyoMp50WdLfjFDQZ4FE2EnT zmyaJRFwDKF4G/3S3faYH16AzyFgkkvxDSyjV6H1Pd1tyQoGdORr3bfCsksGNwAf JHzB/6UsLR1wgfyn5kqemFfCCncmlJ2Sq7YXCZsgwX0vwxW/P7rZB3SftH3StEOb MNTim3siPxHLQ7SXFqkP =rb0N -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
