On 9/22/15 1:00 PM, Leno Hou wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:15 PM, Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote:
On 22 Sep 2015 14:34, Leno Hou wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Mike Frysinger <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 21 Sep 2015 13:15, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 9/21/15 10:02 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
On 09/21/2015 08:38 AM, Leno Hou wrote:
+ self.settings["CHOST"]="powerpc64le-linux-gnu"
The CHOST is incorrect. It should powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu.
Leno,
can you please try to switch it to that and do another catalyst run.
You can begin with your current stage3 with the above CHOST and it
should work out correctly to the new CHOST name. In another place
you
said there is no compiler "powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu" but that
makes
no sense. The tuple is parsed by gnuconfig script and it should work
like all other CHOST names we have in gentoo.
powerpc64le-linux-gnu is a valid tuple (vendor can generally be
omitted),
but in Gentoo we do use "unknown" for our ppc ports. so do as Anthony
says ;).
-mike
When set CHOST="powerpc64le-linux-gnu", successfully compiled stage1.
But CHOST="powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu", something happens as following.
https://bpaste.net/show/189b2b12d8e2
So I think CHOST="powerpc64le-linux-gnu" would be better.
i think you're misreading things. we didn't say
"powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu",
we said "powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu".
-mike
I've tested CHOST="powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu" and proved you're right.
The results is that got compiler called "powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu-*"
in stage 1.
So could you help me to commit PATCH v2 ? thanks.
-Leno Hou
Where is it? I have commit to the catalyst repo.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail : [email protected]
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
