On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 22:44:07 -0500
Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> The catalyst-auto automation scripts live in a repo separate from
> catalyst. That increases the difficulty of changing catalyst's
> interface, and it doesn't seem to offer any advantages otherwise.
> (Keeping build specs in a separate repo allows them to be updated
> independent of catalyst and that is valuable). Additionally, since the
> primary way catalyst is used is via this automation, it makes sense to
> support this workflow in catalyst directly.
> 
> But to get there, there are some changes to catalyst that I think are
> improvements on their own and simplify the path to integrating
> automation capabilities directly into catalyst. That's what I'd like
> to discuss here.
> 


I have been thinking for the past few years that the automation could
benefit from using a buildbot to run the stages.   In that way it
would set the required variables, run the stages in sequence.  Upon
failure, buildbot makes it easy to re-run failed steps from where they
left off.  Or initiate unscheduled builds. It also makes it easy to see
detailed logs (by anyone with a browser if the buildbot is public
viewable) of the various steps for debugging, etc..


Perhaps with your new spec file, you add a varialbe that lists the
stages to run in sequence.  In that way it would preserve the old
capability of running single stages independantly or a full sequence.
Or perhaps a cli option to override the setting on an unedited spec
file.

ie:  

[build.stages]
stage1
stage2
stage3
livecd1
livecd2


sorry, not familiar with toml 

In that way a spec file could be edited simply to restart from any
point with a single variable edit without removing unused [build.???]
definitions for the full run.  This would be particularly useful when
troubleshooting hidden/delayed stage build fails.


Overall, I do agree that the releng automation scripts capabilities
should be part of the caltlyst repo in order for them to be up-to-date
with catalyst code.

I have limited time and resources lately, so can't help out much until
I get back home (probably Xmas) largely due to covid...  I only have
this small laptop and my eyes are not that good to be doing lots of
work on a tiny 14 inch screen and a stage run to take hours instead
of minutes... (yes, I got spoiled with 2 28 inch 4K displays, 16-core
128k ram system at home...)

Brian Dolbec
<dol...@gentoo.org>

Reply via email to