-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bryan Green wrote:
> Interesting question.  Is there a difference?
> I am under the impression that lam-mpi needs to be built with pgf for
> programs that use lam-mpi to be built with pgf.  Am I mistaken?
> I any case, I found that I get get it to build by setting the FC environment
> variable.  My initial error was apparently caused because of the lack of a
> license server setting.

Good to hear it! If you ever come across an ebuild where FC/F77, CC, or
CXX aren't respected, please file a bug.

Thanks,
Donnie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFENGDCXVaO67S1rtsRAl4OAJ0RlEnM3fDvxBTzRvMApVWHxue+8wCgvuxU
+xxlBjNGvueLX9cVCuD9M6I=
=Stmf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to