commit:     87ea31e871d19af32750bdd187a84589cffd329b
Author:     Ulrich Müller <ulm <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
AuthorDate: Tue Mar 24 12:10:05 2020 +0000
Commit:     Ulrich Müller <ulm <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
CommitDate: Tue Mar 24 12:10:05 2020 +0000
URL:        https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/devmanual.git/commit/?id=87ea31e8

ebuild-writing/file-format: New subsection for binary packages.

Discussion reference:
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/8dadfbd3c15b6580abb84882e9115a47
and replies.

Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm <AT> gentoo.org>

 ebuild-writing/file-format/text.xml | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/ebuild-writing/file-format/text.xml 
b/ebuild-writing/file-format/text.xml
index 16d857e..5eb0cf8 100644
--- a/ebuild-writing/file-format/text.xml
+++ b/ebuild-writing/file-format/text.xml
@@ -140,6 +140,27 @@ The policy for so-called <e>live</e> ebuilds
 is to use <c>9999</c> as the version (or as the last version component).
 </p>
 
+</body>
+</subsection>
+
+<subsection>
+<title>Binary packages</title>
+<body>
+
+<p>
+Gentoo usually builds its packages from source. Exceptionally, a binary package
+can be provided instead (e.g., if upstream does not provide a source).
+Such packages should still follow normal naming conventions and do not need any
+special suffix.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+If a binary package is provided in addition to its open-source based
+equivalent, the name of the former should be suffixed with <c>-bin</c>
+if necessary for distinction. Examples are packages that are heavy on resources
+like CPU time or memory when being built from source.
+</p>
+
 </body>
 </subsection>
 </section>

Reply via email to