commit: 6399e61090a8d9839fb71715dc31cb95bedad5e5
Author: Ulrich Müller <ulm <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
AuthorDate: Mon Apr 10 13:17:41 2023 +0000
Commit: Ulrich Müller <ulm <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
CommitDate: Sat Apr 15 11:58:21 2023 +0000
URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/data/glep.git/commit/?id=6399e610
glep-0039: Fix whitespace
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm <AT> gentoo.org>
glep-0039.rst | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/glep-0039.rst b/glep-0039.rst
index 5edcb25..d52ec2a 100644
--- a/glep-0039.rst
+++ b/glep-0039.rst
@@ -81,12 +81,12 @@ Problems with the existing system
1. The assumption that TLPs are complete is either incorrect (there
still is no "server" TLP) or just plain weird (but the lack of a
server TLP is technically okay because all devs who don't have an
- obvious TLP belong to the "base" TLP by default).
+ obvious TLP belong to the "base" TLP by default).
2. There is nothing at all to ensure that project leads actually do
represent the devs they supposedly lead or satisfy their
responsibilities. Indeed, should a TLP manager go AWOL it is not at
all obvious how the situation should be resolved.
-3. Nothing is being decided at global scope right now. Some TLP strategic
+3. Nothing is being decided at global scope right now. Some TLP strategic
managers rarely attend the managers' meetings, and the managers as a
whole certainly are not providing any sort of global vision for
Gentoo right now.
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ B. Global issues will be decided by an elected Gentoo
council.
Rationale
=========
-So, does this proposal solve any of the previously-mentioned problems?
+So, does this proposal solve any of the previously-mentioned problems?
1. There is no longer any requirement that the project structure be
complete. Some devs work on very specific parts of the tree, while
