commit:     ccc97ae9448678fa5971a4a41f89e8778550ceed
Author:     Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93 <AT> gmail <DOT> com>
AuthorDate: Mon Feb  5 13:40:58 2024 +0000
Commit:     Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
CommitDate: Mon Feb  5 14:10:55 2024 +0000
URL:        https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=ccc97ae9

profiles/arch/hppa: update and expand cups + pdf stable-mask

Previously, USE=pdf depended on mupdf, which is unstable for hppa and
blocked cups stabilization. This is still the case, except now the cups
packages have been reworked so there are additional packages exposing
the same USE=pdf, and which also need to be masked.

Add a couple extra masks to this group.

Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/923811
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/627392
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93 <AT> gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam <AT> gentoo.org>

 profiles/arch/hppa/package.use.stable.mask | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/profiles/arch/hppa/package.use.stable.mask 
b/profiles/arch/hppa/package.use.stable.mask
index ccbecff2e469..c12bd0c48c58 100644
--- a/profiles/arch/hppa/package.use.stable.mask
+++ b/profiles/arch/hppa/package.use.stable.mask
@@ -17,6 +17,14 @@
 
 #--- END OF EXAMPLES ---
 
+# Eli Schwartz <eschwart...@gmail.com> (2024-02-05)
+# Mask pdf support so net-print/cups-filters stabilisation
+# can go ahead (bug 627392)
+# and subsequently bug 923811
+net-print/cups-filters pdf
+net-print/libcupsfilters pdf
+net-print/cups-meta pdf
+
 # Sam James <s...@gentoo.org> (2023-06-18)
 # Qt 5 not stable here
 app-text/ansifilter gui
@@ -258,11 +266,6 @@ dev-ruby/bundler doc
 dev-ruby/rspec-core highlight test
 sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools test
 
-# Andreas Sturmlechner <ast...@gentoo.org> (2017-09-30)
-# Mask pdf support so net-print/cups-filters stabilisation
-# can go ahead (bug 627392)
-net-print/cups-filters pdf
-
 # David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> (2017-09-23)
 #  >=virtual/mpi-2.0-r4 does not have stable keywords on hppa
 # Boost 1.63 (bug 624662), Boost 1.62 (bug 590244)

Reply via email to