I live in Austin, TX and am active with the Capital Area Central Texas Unix Society (CACTUS). IBM has a big operation here, and at one point CACTUS had a presentation by some of the principals in the EVMS project who were employed by IBM locally. IBM basically funded the development of EVMS by paying these folks to work full time on it, and the entire project was open sourced from the git-go. Kudos to IBM for this one!
The impression I got was that EVMS was never intended to be competitive with LVM, but was rather intended to be an umbrella disk management system which would handle RAID, LVM, partitioning, etc - anything in Linux which involves management of disk utilization. There are basically two parts to EVMS. One is the management system itself, which presents a published API. This was the central part of the project, as I understood it. The EVMS devs also wrote a GUI to interact with the API, which was both a proof of concept and a usable interface. There are also CLI tools to manage EVMS, yes? Same API. So basically EVMS was always focused at a higher level of management than is LVM. I'm not sure, but it may be that EVMS is also capable of doing volume management on AIX, too. On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 10:34 +0000, Duncan wrote: > I haven't looked into EVMS, no. However, as I understand it, while > EVMS > and LVM2 were at one time built on different kernel mechanisms, when > LVM2 > was selected for merging into the mainline kernel (2.5 era I believe, > 2002), EVMS decided rather than fight it, to take their already great > management tools and make them work with the LVM2 framework as it was > merged into the kernel. =8^) Thus, I believe EVMS is now simply what > amounts to a GUI front-end to the LVM2 system as it exists in the > kernel > and lower level command-line tools. > -- [email protected] mailing list
