On Friday 26 December 2008 03:54:54 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> > Hello
>
> Hi
>
> > we are having a small issue here concerning the two overlays. Since the
> > eclasses, the live ebuilds and the snapshots are in a good shape now (in
> > fact eclasses are about to hit the tree), kde-crazy offers nothing but
> > confusion now. There's no reason to have to sync eclasses between
> > overlays every time, it's boring, time consuming and maintaining two
> > overlays in a single system is very difficult (should i say impossible?)
> > I can't test eclasses for the co-existence of snapshots and live in a
> > single system at the moment for example. Furthermore, even devs don't
> > know where is the right place to commit :) Initially i thought it would
> > be better to have in a separate overlay all the ebuilds that are going to
> > hit tree, but now i don't. I'd like to hear everybody's opinion,
> > especially jmbsvicetto's since (iirc) he proposed the kde-crazy overlay
>
> I still think there's a place and purpose for both overlays. 
I agree with this
> Let me 
> recall you the reasons for them:
>
>  * kde-testing - the purpose of this overlay is to be a stage for
> ebuilds going into the tree and for having "reasonably" stable ebuilds
> for packages that we don't want to put in the tree. For instance, the
> bumps for 4.1.4 and 4.1.86/90 should be done here.
>  * kde-crazy - overlay for hosting the live ebuilds and for doing the
> really "wacky" experiments (features for long term). As an example, work
> for 4.3 snapshots should start here.
>

I my mind , kde-testing is for kinda "stable" packages while kde-crazy is for 
experiments. For example , i keep chaning qt-4.5.0_beta ebuilds. I would feel 
really guilty if those packages were in kde-testing overlay cause I would not 
feel comfortable chaning them.
See, kde-craze is like a kde/qt playgroun for development and testing while 
kde-testing offers kde packages that are consider *highly* testing to be in 
portage. 
> I think most of your problems are happening because having eclasses in
> any of the overlays makes things harder. The reason any eclass should be
> added to the kde-testing overlay is to get it final testing before
> moving into the tree. Any major change on eclasses should start on
> kde-crazy.
>
> > Regards,
> > Theodore

Markos

-- 
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)

Reply via email to