Ok, but if we look for Amarok, http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=amarok , there's a bunch of bugs for this application but it's not masked.
And again, I'm just curious, I only wondered if there was something specifically bad with it. On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Dale <[email protected]> wrote: > Jean-Marc Beaune wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been thinking to move to KNetworkManager for a while (more than > > one year) and seeing that it's always masked didn't make me confident > > (I run as much as I can a stable arch). > > But finally I migrated from baselayout management to KNetworkManager > > few days ago and it seems to work quite well (not a long experience > > though). > > > > Hence, the question, I'm just curious. > > > > Thank you. > > > > P.S.: I used > > [url=http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/KNetworkManager]this[/url > > <http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/KNetworkManager%5Dthis%5B/url>] howto > > and it went just fine. > > > > -- > > Jean-Marc > > > > > Here is some reading materials: > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=knetworkmanager > > I think this is the one that has it masked: > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253788 > > Comment number 2 mentions this is why it is masked among other reasons. > > Most of the time if something is masked, there is a bug for it. Just > search for it. Resolved bugs should not make a package be masked but > open ones can. > > Hope that helps. > > Dale > > :-) :-) > > -- Jean-Marc
