As active djbdns user, I'd actually prefer local use flags. On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 12:36, Jared H. Hudson wrote: > I have several bug reports requesting patches to djbdns. I would like to > make these patches optional so that a user can emerge a "vanilla" djbdns > if they choose to. What is the best way to do this? > > Create a super-djbdns port with all the patches? > Create a vanilla-djbdns port with no patches? > Use the current djbdns port, but create local use flags for each patch? > > Some of the bug id#'s in question are: 14678, 19375, 20880, 31238 & 32080 > > Any suggestions would be appreciated. > Thanks, > Jared H. > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- Ilya Volynets Total Knowledge Chief Technology Officer http://www.total-knowledge.com
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
