On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 10:09, Markus Nigbur wrote: > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:18:09 -0500 (EST) > "donnie berkholz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I had imagined renaming anything that was *-update to config-* also > > for consistency. > > Ehrm, IMHO *-update should be scripts that don't need any user > interaction, like env-update or opengl-update (and yes, etc-update is an > exception; even so it should really be called etc-config. ;) > > so i partly disagree with renaming those to config-*, as it's not a > configuration process, but an automatic update of something.
opengl-update does require user interaction, it needs to know which set of GL libs to link to. You can't just run "opengl-update," you need to run opengl-update ati, opengl-update nvidia or opengl-update xfree. In essence this is no different from gcc-config, distcc-config or java-config.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
