On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 01:06:05AM -0600, Matthew Kennedy wrote: > Sven Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:16:19AM -0600, Matthew Kennedy wrote: > >> Personally, I am only interested in supporting and using free > >> software, so... > >> > >> The best solution is just to remove support for anything non-free in > >> portage and to also remove any non-free software from our mirrors. > >> Let some other external project step up to the plate and provide a > >> non-free overlay if they wish. > > > > I disagree. Give the users who want the chance to not use "non-free" > > software, but also give the others the chance to use non-free software. > > > > I think you'll get a lot of gamers against you when you tell them you don't > > want them to easily install their favorite non-free game :) > > [...] > > Jon, Sven, > > Obviously, its more important that the "gamers" are not upset by a > single line change in make.conf. The principle of building a Free > software distribution has got to be less important than that. >
And because I forgot to mention it in my previous mail... You were not suggesting making people make a single line change. You were suggesting forcing all nonfree software out of the tree. -- Jon Portnoy avenj/irc.freenode.net -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
