Replying to my own messages feels very strange... but anyway On Sunday 23 November 2003 02:49, Jason Stubbs wrote: > There is also no checking of * or -, but I'm guessing that's already > abstracted in portage. Or does it only apply to USE? Anyway, will check on > that later. Just looking at the code for USE and found that it doesn't implement * either, only -*. Thinking about how to implement * with the licenses, I can understand why. Is * necessary? Mightn't it be legally dangerous for the end-user? Jason -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
- [gentoo-dev] License Checking Jason Stubbs
- Re: [gentoo-dev] License Checking Jason Stubbs
- Re: [gentoo-dev] License Checking Aron Griffis
- Re: [gentoo-dev] License Checking Spider
- Re: [gentoo-dev] License Checking Aron Griffis
- Re: [gentoo-dev] License Checki... Sven Vermeulen
- Re: [gentoo-dev] License Checking Jason Stubbs
- Re: [gentoo-dev] License Checking Christian Birchinger
- Re: [gentoo-dev] License Checking Paul de Vrieze
- Re: [gentoo-dev] License Checki... Luke-Jr
- Re: [gentoo-dev] License Ch... Jason Wever
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Licens... Luke-Jr
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Licens... Toby Dickenson
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Licens... Jason Wever
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Licens... Chris Bainbridge
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Licens... Luke-Jr
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Licens... Brett I. Holcomb
