Replying to my own messages feels very strange... but anyway

On Sunday 23 November 2003 02:49, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> There is also no checking of * or -, but I'm guessing that's already
> abstracted in portage. Or does it only apply to USE? Anyway, will check on
> that later.

Just looking at the code for USE and found that it doesn't implement * either, 
only -*. Thinking about how to implement * with the licenses, I can 
understand why. Is * necessary? Mightn't it be legally dangerous for the 
end-user?

Jason

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to