-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 05 December 2003 04:58, George Shapovalov wrote: > To reiterate them shortly, Prolog is a really esoteric language and I am > not sure we will be able to find enough people to feel comfortable about > having the very core of portage-ng implemented in it. Also there might be > issues of portability and efficiency..
i'm divided on this issue ... on one hand i hate prolog :) ... and i know there are plenty of peeps out there who feel the same thus leading to your point about lack of supporters ... on the other i know it's very good for somethings and perhaps this is one of them ... i dont think you should worry about portability since we have prolog interpreters in dev-lang that are built in C ... and we could run tests with different ones for efficiency ... imho if it's better than the current python speed, i'm all for it :) - -mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBP9CSb0FjO5/oN/WBAQI5EQ//eWlNYb67b0YK3ivIGofkZrlrLRGAn7DV C+F7RTYkauk8WJE5Jd+04d1vVKuTr5S+aHNFsy58kPjW/b7e0POF/RGSd+ZMesJ5 S8hrlgaIXbP/yMvFhopTRg/IVGNA5vOxQtEaGiPwPDZFnoumX0+DlKsQ0kfPFDFI QRGwzT1M+UGQTREp0sU8N06WHs6F4hhQA8q+ZdFmWCQM84tfSZk3XsCU2vxzd4zk LjwnkI5rePVS6/kQCFLyDbJeupz0CP2DNVqRHs8FxWBWfVt6Yd/OiQ1xANHwDIjz 3eD30ix/aACFl3nMbGX+pLQkH1SyJYp+FUYBG+GvXfDjDVhvLTYGbMcTq1tHTqdX YKgeyz6Jcz0unrB1RNQEpLWrdiubdoadq7sNAsH0vFIT7m/TSMR2J4gDIUK4eVWL 5faG0OWx9UtMIh8XPzZwAoliQW8UEektSibxjHKAJ6UDizu9u/o7w3As1Yj8G2eq pJ5TyR1IJpQ9iS7r/dm1vn5jb+YHFVuVHCty8SSZReq2ESnXQyslRklKPhztn2ev AL0Dxex6y6FPAkukyqyTZR0IMke8qm6vupcNVeXP71TIbM9McDSoom40QA5sNt/W adYV6MABILIQzIb3qeaBc2unZ8INPDdY51NylSas5kqEAzRNfNctaAliFO/SIxzb ySGRZpeDlos= =f3nG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
