On Tuesday 09 December 2003 09:53, Jason Stubbs wrote: > On Tuesday 09 December 2003 07:00, Luke-Jr wrote: > > On Monday 08 December 2003 09:41 pm, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > > Speaking of the java USE flag, I would suggest that a new java-dev flag > > > should still add gcj to gcc. If a java developer doesn't want gcj, > > > that's a per-package customization issue that will be fully supported > > > in portage-ng (and 2.0.50?) > > > > Shouldn't gcj be enabled simply by java-user? How else are they going to > > emerge/compile a Java pkg? > > I haven't installed many java-based packages from source - only one that I > can remember. It required virtual/jdk and pulled in blackdown. I figured > all others would be the same. If they're not, that is simply another > indication of the same problem.
Just did some grepping of the portage tree and couldn't find any others that were different. Many packages use virtual/jre instead but they don't compile java source files at all. Regards, Jason Stubbs -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
