On Sunday 28 December 2003 03:32, Spider wrote: > begin quote > On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 20:22:53 -0500 > > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Saturday 27 December 2003 19:24, Spider wrote: > > > Oh yes! even more. > > > > > > Can people who feel like it take a look for all builds that contain > > > the > > > word "newdepend" and think at least twice? remember.. newdepend > > > means that RDEPEND won't be set (unless you do newrdepend) which > > > means that the package will be broken in GRP situations. > > > > > > (Yep, its a known fact that all of KDE is broken and unless fixed > > > cannot be reliably distributed on our next release.) > > > > the newXdepend's should only be used in eclasses > > Even worse, there are ~300 ebuilds in the tree that uses them.
It might have been an idea for that the people changing the semantics would also have announced the need for a fix. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature
