On Sat, 2004-01-24 at 19:36, Brian Jackson wrote: > So one of my big goals for my time as kernel tlp manager is to come up with a > way to have more than one person responsible for each Gentoo kernel. It's > been to the point in the past where a Gentoo kernel wasn't actively > maintained. That shouldn't happen in a project this size. I've finally gotten > some more kernel devs coming on board, so now all I have to do is come up > with a way to allow them to do their jobs. > > The main problem is I can't come up with a way to handle this well. > > We can't really subject cvs.gentoo.org to the kind of abuse that 5 kernel > trees would introduce. Subversion isn't an option (and I'd assume that arch, > and others isn't either). > > So, I come to you to help me brainstorm. Any good ideas, let me know.
How much abuse do you think it would honestly be? Would it be worth setting up a kernel.gentoo.org cvs repository just for you guys? I tend to think that the kernels are a very important item for Gentoo, and something you probably hear the most complaining about when they fall even the slightest bit behind in version. -- Chris Gianelloni Developer, Gentoo Linux Games Team Is your power animal a pengiun?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
