On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 07:21:16PM -0600 or thereabouts, Brian Jackson wrote: > Not really any failures keeping it from being considered. The infrastructure > team wants to support cvs and only cvs.
Not entirely accurate. If there are compelling reasons to use another solution instead of CVS, we are certainly willing to look at other solutions. "Because I like it better" or "because it works better for me" is generally not a good reason. We would prefer to support only one version control system, be it CVS, BitKeeper, Subversion or whatever. We don't really have the resources, time or inclination to support multiple version control systems. If there are strong, clearly articulated reasons why Gentoo, as a project, cannot progress without supporting multiple version control systems, then we're certainly willing to look at that, too. Anyone developer wishing to change over to a new system should probably start with a GLEP. --kurt
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
