On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 04:14, Drake Wyrm wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:02:23AM -0500, in > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Blake Matheny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Whatchu talkin' 'bout, Willis? > > > I think dev-cl doesnt tell much, might be better to have something like > > > dev-clisp.. and while we're at it.. dev-lisp... > > Not what I was suggesting. As seemant said, I think a good direction to go > > would be lisp-clisp, lisp-scheme, etc as the game categories have done. > I know convention states that categories will be named <type>-<subtype> > and, by the "games" precedent, split into <subtype>-<subsubtype> when > necessary. Is there anything that actually stops us from using more than > one dash in a category name? I can see that this opens a huge can-o-worms, > but how about dev-lisp, dev-lisp-clisp, dev-lisp-scheme, etc.?
I am pretty sure that categories can only have one dash. At least I know that was true, but I am not positive if it still holds to be the same. -- Chris Gianelloni Developer, Gentoo Linux Games Team Is your power animal a penguin?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
