On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:13:49AM +0100 or thereabouts, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> It would be included into the snapshot for x86 and ppc only. It is very 
> uncommon for an ebuild that is stable enough to go into the snapshot to 
> be accidently marked stable for an arch. Also we will have QA over the 
> snapshot before it is released. This QA will at least involve making all 
> packages (for a GRP tree). As we are dealing with a snapshot it is 
> actually easier to ensure that things compile because a lot of variation 
> is taken away. You can ensure that you only have say openssl-0.7 so you 
> don't get problems with openssl-6

I think you may be confusing the snapshot we make for GRP packages with the
proposed stable tree.  There are no plans to offer GRP packages of the
stable tree.

Not to say we can't/won't do it, but it's not included as part of this
GLEP.  Again, if the QA folks want to leverage this tree and provide
additional QA efforts around it, that's great.  That's not the primary
target of this GLEP, however.

--kurt

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to