Andrew Gaffney wrote:
I am currently bootstrapping on another system. I added "nptl" to the USE flags. I started scripts/bootstrap-2.6.sh. It gave me an error about sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.6.0 being masked so I edited the build and added x86 to KEYWORDS and ran scripts/bootstrap-2.6.sh again. Will this leave me with a from-scratch NPTL-enabled system?
You might want to run this patch on your linux-headers before you try to build XFree86.
--- kd.h.orig 2004-02-03 10:51:27.818963120 -0600 +++ kd.h 2004-02-03 10:51:36.501643152 -0600 @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@
struct kbd_repeat {
int delay; /* in msec; <= 0: don't change */
- int period; /* in msec; <= 0: don't change */
+ int rate; /* in msec; <= 0: don't change */
/* earlier this field was misnamed "rate" */
};Of course, you may want to change it back again after you emerge XFree86.
--- kd.h 2004-02-03 10:51:36.501643152 -0600 +++ kd.h.orig 2004-02-03 10:51:27.818963120 -0600 @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@
struct kbd_repeat {
int delay; /* in msec; <= 0: don't change */
- int rate; /* in msec; <= 0: don't change */
+ int period; /* in msec; <= 0: don't change */
/* earlier this field was misnamed "rate" */
};I think a kernel specific conditional patch should be included in XFree86 as it is unlikely the linux kernel headers are going to change back.
Tom Veldhouse
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
