> > > I think one solution would be to force > > > an update to the latest version of dependencies. It would go around any > > > binary problems like this, but it still wouldn't be pretty. > > > > Only if the binary was built against the latest version of dependencies! > > If it was built against (in this case) openssl-0.9.6, then you'd be > > creating the problem you're trying to solve. > > We could just set the RDEPEND in the binary packages to be >= the versions > installed on the system that compiled the package.
Nope, this won't work, for the building-against-openssl-0.9.6-but- deploying-against-openssl-0.9.7 reasons. -- When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
