Hi Tom, I have asked to set up ppc64 bugzilla things for you.
Pieter On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 10:35:38AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Greetings All, > > I'm seeking some direction / advise with regards to ppc64 bringup. > Specifically as brad and I are bringing up ppc64, it would be nice to > document bugs / changes inside of the current bug infrastruture on > bugs.gentoo.org. > Looking at the bugzilla query page, it would appear at first blush that > perhaps there are two things that might need to be added. > > 1) add ppc64 to the Hardware field. This seems obvious. :-) > > 2) add Gentoo Linux/PPC64 under the Product field. Tho perhaps I'm > reading into what the meaning of "product" is here. I would have > expected to see AMD64 / x64_64 here as certainly that's a supported > architecture on gentoo so maybe product refers more to some cd sold off > of the gentoo.org page. > > Anyway, does this seem reasonable to support this new architecture(*)? > > * Yes PPC64 is a "new" architecture. Think of it as ppc64 is to ppc as > amd64 is to ia32. > > If it's not reasonable, what is the *right* way to track issues? > Should I flood the ppc family with ppc64 bugs that don't apply to them? > That seems stupid! > > Thanks! > > Tom Gall > gentoo-ppc64 -- God started with stage 1, shouldn't you? > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > tgall aatt uberh4x0r.org > tom_gall aatt mac.com > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQFALPzaNM6ZoaBWhQkRAnyCAJ0aFSUk8SGuFrLb8xqdyF25bgihKACgjh58 > LmPGgeCba+0dtuWaLGhURRY= > =HOHQ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
