On Monday 03 January 2005 02:39, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 02 January 2005 12:43 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > If vim is built with USE="blah", and the blah library is present in
> > /usr/local, vim will link against the /usr/local version. This is
> > causing problems for at least one user. On the other hand, I'm
> > thinking that this behaviour is probably desirable, in that it allows
> > users to link against non-portage-installed apps if the user so
> > desires.
>
> i dont think packages should insert -L<standard search path> ... the
> compiler and friends should handle that step ...
>
> we should never prevent packages from being able to utilize /usr/local
> as the user suggests though ... if someone installs a package
> themselves into /usr/local rather than emerging it, portage shouldnt
> try to ignore it -mike

The problem is mainly being caused by ?erronous? configure scripts that 
look in /usr/local first, before looking at /usr. This because the 
package get's build often in /usr/local by local administrators. In 
gentoo, the "best" thing to do is to make an ebuild and just install all 
crap in /usr, but gentoo is not the average binary distro.

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

Attachment: pgpsK36qF8jxm.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to