On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 14:42 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 19:17 +0000, John Mylchreest wrote:
> > >  And it's naming is not very explicative either,
> > > it's too tied to a specific context.
> > 
> > I couldn't think of a better name tbh. Can you?
> 
> kernel-symlink seems a bit more appropriate.  Of course, with that being
> the case, it could probably have stayed a local USE and just been used
> in the eclasses.

that was going to be the original idea actually, just keep it local use
although I thought with the number of ebuilds inheriting this flag, it
was better suited global. Its something I'm quite happy to change.

-- 
Role:            Gentoo Linux Kernel Lead
Gentoo Linux:    http://www.gentoo.org
Public Key:      gpg --recv-keys 9C745515     
Key fingerprint: A0AF F3C8 D699 A05A EC5C  24F7 95AA 241D 9C74 5515
Web:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9C745515

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to