On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 10:55:42AM -0500, Brandon Hale wrote:
> 
> It would seem ideal to me to cut out this human factor as much as
> possible and get the word to every maintainer sooner, allowing him to
> solve it sooner. This might not always be effective, take a case where a
> vulnerability is disclosed but no patch is available, but could cut at
> least hours if not days from our response time. The first small step
> I've thought of to speed up notification is to create an alias for
> kernel-security@ which includes members of the kernel team proper and at
> least one maintainer for each external -sources. This will create a
> single point of contact for kernel issues, and for the kernel team
> proper, separate high priority security bugs from their usual flood of
> email to kernel@, possibly allowing them to catch it faster as a
> pleasant side effect. Ideally Bugzilla could CC this alias on the
> creation of Gentoo Security bugs in the Kernel component.

kernel@ isn't that busy right now (as an email address, not as a
bugzilla address), having been on the alias for a while now.  I really
don't see how having yet-another-email-alias will help increase the
visibility or speed in our kernel updates.

One maintainer of each external -sources should already be on that
alias, it's not that big.

thanks,

greg k-h

--
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to