On Saturday 15 January 2005 22:13, Roman Gaufman wrote: > Been using this since morning. Working absolutely beautifully. Far > better than expected. 5 thumbs up! > > Just 1 small problem so far: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78123 Was fixed before you posted ;-)
> > Other than that, its confusing that all packages are in kde-base. > Shouldnt you put the kdemultimedia specific packages under > kdemultimedia, etc? What do you mean, 'under' kdemultimedia? Do you want 15 new categories - kde-multimedia, kde-base etc - one for each monolithic ebuild? Please explain why you find it confusing. To us, it makes it easy to act on the set of all official kde.org applications. If we were to put eg konqueror in www-client, you could find it if you were looking for 'a browser', but not if you were looking for 'the kde browser' - assuming you didn't know its name. More importantly, half the packages would end up in kde-misc anyway ;-) If you want to group split ebuids by their parent packages, you can grep for KMNAME. Every split ebuild defines eg KMNAME=kdebase. Does that help? -- Dan Armak Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951
pgp97wSqH6DK8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
