On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 21:38 +0000, Roman Gaufman wrote: > On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 13:25:07 -0800, Donnie Berkholz > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Try again, this time with the stable xine-lib version :) > > > > Why would I be trying to combine unstable X with stable xine-lib? You > > can't expect unstable to always work with stable. It's designed to work > > properly with what's in unstable. > > > Ssorry for sending the previous message to you and not the mailing list. > > I dont expect stable to work together with unstable all the time. But > isnt the whole point of unstable to test packages against stable so > they can be unmasked? > > Anyway, the masked xine-lib works, but it depends on aalib and cacalib > for no good reason ignoring my use flag settings. > > And here is the bug I reported about 1_rc8-r1 (stable): > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78129 - feel free to close it > in favor of getting xine-lib-1.0 unmasked if you like.
If I like? I don't do xine-lib. =) And you have to realize that sometimes things need to be done simultaneously -- one change can depend on another. ~arch should work with ~arch, arch should work with arch, but ~arch with arch is not necessarily guaranteed.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
