On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 21:49 -0700, Jason Wever wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Jason Wever wrote: > > > Happy to be the latest jumping on the 2005 goals and inbox spamming > > bandwagon, it's your neighborhood friendly SPARC team! > > > > Here they are, in order of some maniacal madman's priority; > > > > - Gustavoz for president > > - Get 64-bit support working and into the main sparc64 profile > > - Soft ice cream machine for the developer lounge > > - GCC 3.4.x into main profile > > - Help raise awareness of other archs and portability issues amongst other > > developers. > > - X based LiveCD > > - Possibly recruiting some sparc32 devs to help sparc32 survive > > - Possibly look into setting up a non-dev QA team like amd64 has > > currently > > - World domination > > Apparently my GPG signature on this email shows up as bad for some folks. > I did indeed send it out and signed it, but apparently something is a > little whacked with my config. Hopefully this one will check out OK to > allay any concerned parties. > > If not, please panic, trample as many people as humanly possible and then > run for the hills. > > Thanks, > - -- > Jason Wever > Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFB7JVmdKvgdVioq28RAnVTAJ95jg3YJsNbX8doV8aL+/RdJD8L9wCfeJcg > kuTzV92uj0dI63pGAK9DnoI= > =DLpJ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- > [email protected] mailing list
You *last* one looked fine to me. Of course, I had your public key in my keyring already, but it shouldn't matter. I think it is more an issue of different people using different keyservers. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Operational/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
