Ernst Herzberg wrote:
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 16:09, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 05:37 +0100, Ernst Herzberg wrote:
Nice messages, all with wrong or not existent signatures.
Try another keyserver. I believe most of the developers use pgp.mit.edu
as their keyserver.
I'm using hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net (or de.pgp.net, or serch.keyserver.net...),
and all servers syncronise very fast. Eample the key from daniel Goller, he
has uploaded the key, and now i am able to verfify his message successful.
Doug's signs are still bad, but the key seems to be valid, previous messages
dont had this problems.
If a message has a bad sign, this message is _invalid_. If a softwareproblem
raises this probles, don't use it. If everybody or most people ignores wrong
signs, something goes completly wrong...
Another question: Why are keys from new developer are no signed? A minimun of
one another dev must have trust him, or not? :-)
<Earny>
If someone can figure out why my signs are bad. I'd appreciate it. I
have no idea. I just re-uploaded all my keys. I'm using Thunderbird.
--
Doug Goldstein
http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x179106D0
Key fingerprint = 7001 5FBF BACE 9E66 3A1C 55E0 161C FF5C 1791 06D0
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
