-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 John Mylchreest wrote: >>>This way, we can pretty much automate it as my previous example, without >>>needing to worry about userland or firmware overhead at all. >>> >> >>And it would be much of a transition for users, just getting devs to do >>what they should have done from the begining :-). > > > Devs, yes. > users, no not really. > portage updates file will change the cache entries as we need them too, > so it shouldn't cause any problems. Also, we will of course publicise > this. > Hehe, oops yea, I ment to say "And it would not be much of a transition for users"
- -- Michael Marineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux Developer Oregon State University -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB7qsHiP+LossGzjARArm5AJ4gxrNB3nN0Hmk5S66pYoneC8DxCACffw1B JDjGimgXziHM8I5DPR2q5Rs= =TAbx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [email protected] mailing list
