On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 16:38 -0200, Fernando Serboncini wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 18:47 +0200, Martin Schlemmer [c] wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 09:46 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 12:07 -0200, Fernando Serboncini wrote:
> > > > I don't think I see the light here.
> > > > What's the use of virtualx.eclass without X support? It basically uses
> > > > xhost and Xvfb to create another DISPLAY, so I don't think it even runs
> > > > without virtual/x11 installed.
> > > > 
> > > > And since you're talking about virtualx dependency... 
> > > > 
> > > > Last week I had a problem with virtualx eclass because it uses Xvfb
> > > > which isn't installed if xorg-x11 is built with USE="minimal". If
> > > > there's no other alternative, I think virtualx should "built_with_use
> > > > xorg-x11 minimal" and fail nicely if this happen. 
> > > > 
> > > > Also, there should be a warning somewhere, so developers can know that
> > > > virtualx only works on full xorg-x11.
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately, it is not that simple.  Packages should still be able to
> > > compile if xorg-x11 was built with minimal.  Look at the recent changes
> > > to pyopengl to see how it was done there.
> > > 
> > > I don't really see this one as being quite so easy to resolve.
> 
> I know what you mean. I was the one who fixed opengl. And the solution
> was to remove "inherit virtualx", since there's no way to use it with
> xorg-x11 minimal (Xvfb needed).
> 

Some thing probably do not need it anymore, but just removing might not
do it for all.  But I have not looked at what you talked about, so just
disregard this if not applicable.

> > One method might be to at least install Xvfb as well, even if
> > USE=minimal?
> 
> It would be good to have Xvfb on xorg-x11 minimal. But I don't know if
> it conflicts with USE="minimal" objectives.
> 

I would say X is already bloated, minimal or not, so just adding Xvfb
will
not make that a difference, especially since it it critical to building
some packages.  But it is not my call, as why I CC'd Donnie in my
previous
post.


-- 
Martin Schlemmer
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
Cape Town, South Africa

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to