On Sunday, February 13, 2005 11:20 pm, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> Well, you could also consider that the ebuilds all belong to the same
> product -- portage tree. They share the same cvs module, to say
> something in defense of this statement. Therefore, a new version of an
> ebuild can be considered to be an update for the "portage tree" product.

I am not a lawyer, however I believe that the Portage tree constitutes a 
collective work rather than a derivative work. 

As a collective work (being the unitary whole), the snapshots could be 
copyrighted in the form you mentioned, but the individual packages would need 
to be copyrighted independently. Consider SourceForge: if one were to 
assemble all of the resources that it contains into an enormous tarball, it 
could be distributed as a collective work, but each of the individual 
software applications would still retain their own sets of copyright 
information. The same would apply to KDE, and so forth.


-- 
Anthony Gorecki
Ectro-Linux Foundation

Attachment: pgpElit1k1YTU.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to