On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 10:21:13AM -0800, John Myers wrote:
> On Friday 18 February 2005 05:07, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > J?rgen H?tzel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) scribbled:
> > So where the 'locate' db will get out of sync with what is really on the
> > system, the 'eix' db is never out of sync cause it gets synced right
> > after the portage db (at least, that's the way my cron is set up).  So
> > why not merge them together?  
> 
> Perhaps some sort of 'hook' could be added to emerge sync that would allow
> a program to be run after every sync?
It's been talked about, and has an open bug afaik.
It's a good suggestion, and I'd like it in portage.  That said, I (personally) 
don't want it in, till things are 
saner.  Enough cruft as is- the sync refactoring that's in cvs head probably 
could allow for the hook, assuming a 
-sane- hook was defined, and either a portage dev took it under their wing, or 
someone stepped up with a -clean- 
patch.  It's not a priority for me, but a hook/plugin system is needed at some 
point.
~brian

--
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to