On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 01:07:20AM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 19:00:22 -0600 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | Well, what is eutils? Yes, portage thinks it's an eclass, but -what- > | truly is it? It's bash functionality, that doesn't modify the ebuild > | template/metadata. > > Wrong! eutils (and flag-o-matic, for that matter) modifies ebuild > metadata. Only for epatch.
What about the following? epause ebeep ecpu_check gen_usr_ldscript draw_line have_NPTL get_number_of_jobs emktemp egetent enewuser enewgroup edos2unix (which should force a dep on sed btw) make_desktop_entry make_session_desktop domenu doicon find_unpackable_files unpack_pdv (that's rather... ugly) unpack_makeself check_license cdrom_get_cds cdrom_load_next_cd cdrom_locate_file_on_cd strip-linguas set_arch_to_kernel set_arch_to_portage preserve_old_lib preserve_old_lib_notify built_with_use epunt_cxx (spanky, ty for this func btw) dopamd newpamd ? So... an eclass that wants enew(user|group) now deps on patch, w/out a valid reason. You're proving my point for why elibs should exist :) ~brian -- [email protected] mailing list
