Georgi Georgiev ha scritto:
Don't know well about gentoo policy about that, in this case, since it's something completely new I suggest the "-*" like a request to be tested from a developer on every arch before leave it at user testing.I hope I am not really hijacking the thread, but:
maillog: 25/02/2005-10:18:12(+0100): Francesco Riosa types
Maybe after some time it has been in the tree keyworded "-*" (testing, testing, testing)?
What's the policy for "-*" v.s. "package.mask"? '-*' is pretty annoying
in my opinion. Is "-*" for really, really bad ebuilds or something?
In every case we are speaking of a still non-existing stuff.
-- [email protected] mailing list
