On Friday 22 April 2005 10:03 am, Spider wrote: > Yes, Will you provide a migration phase? > > That means, can you put busybox-shell to auto-conflict sash and > link /bin/sash to /bin/busybox-sh or what the binary is called?
could be done > Oh, and unless you have another editor as binary built into your shell, > don't remove ed. A "trusted" editor is good. Sash is seldom used for > "My system is haxxored" however its often used for "I fucked up glibc" > and an editor is a handy thing, even if its as obscure as "ed" busybox comes with vi ... i could implement ed in busybox, i'd just rather not have to ;) -mike -- [email protected] mailing list
