On Tuesday 03 May 2005 03:05 am, Stuart Longland wrote:
> Jan Kundr�t wrote:
> > Stuart Longland wrote:
> >>Anyway, wouldn't security updates include the core system, rather than
> >>just things like Apache?
> >
> > Security updates are updates which are fixing *security* problems.
> > Upgrading glibc is not a security update, IMHO :-).
>
> Yep... 100% agree... but {g,�C,diet,bsd,whatever}libc is not immune to
> security issues. :-)and to prove the point we have a few GLSA's for glibc -mike -- [email protected] mailing list
