-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten� wrote:
| Another useflag-related question.
|
| Currently, the encode useflag is defined as follow:
|
| encode - Adds support for MEncoder or LaME encoder, wherever applicable
|
| this is a loose definition which is quite useless for medium user, as
it's
| used also in a non-complete-standard way in all ebuilds.
|
| My proposal is to start using lame useflag to enable lame support (in
software
| which is just encoding on itself), and using encode with a slight
different
| definition for example:
|
| encode - Adds support for encoding files in addiction to decoding

should this be ok'ed make sure to put addition, not addiction
|
| so that it can be used to enable generic encoding support instead of
specific
| using lame or mencoder.
|
| Comments?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFChuvPUpKYMelfdYERAm5XAJ0QKEhbGcBiPju0RWYoDDIeU4NNsQCfby8l
Hy1CnYNhXUTkeOT5t8ZoelE=
=wYmu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
[email protected] mailing list



Reply via email to