Michael, You are very welcome, it was a pleasure to upgrade such a critical piece of Gentoo, even though it required time I could have spent outside in the Florida sun. As for your question about adding in the duplicate status. 'Duplicate' isn't a status, its a resolution state. I point you to http://bugs.gentoo.org/page.cgi?id=fields.html#status for a better explanation. So in a more abstract sense, a Duplicate bug has been 'resolved,' as someone has determined that it is a duplicate bug and pointed the bug to its appropriate original filing. With that said, I put this issue to rest. ;) Yes, it's nitpicky, but I won't impart any bodily harm on you.
-Jeffrey On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 12:42 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote: > (fearing the jeff wrath) > > can we get the dup status added back in though? i know, i know, we're being > nitpicky, and not too many folks have stood up and applauded this effort like > they should have (ahem). Just...unsettling to see bugs marked as resolved - > make it sound like i did something rather than find that the same problem had > been reported a few times :) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list