On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 10:41 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote: > On Wednesday 08 June 2005 03:21 am, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > Now that we've established however that openssl could compile with only > > a perl interpreter and none of the modules, we shouldn't have any > > dependancies in the other direction either? > > Once I find a general consensus on whether we need 2 ebuilds or one with > useflag, right. Even as I type this though I realize that it might impose > complications on the livecd/catalyst/whatchamacallit maintainers if they have > to use a minimal flag for only one package in a set when building a stage1+.
That's simple. Give it the same functionality when called with any of build, bootstrap, or minimal USE flags. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
