I really enjoyed last weeks discussion about enterprise, devs, and
users. But I think a significant number of users don't fall into any of
those categories... well at least I don't.
I'm an admin and have only worked in ISP, NSP, hosting, and startup
gigs. These systems tend to be fast moving, customer and feature driven,
and a bit on the bleeding edge. I don't believe any of those
environments fall into what is normally considered "enterprise", but
they are production systems with a premium on flexibility over stability
much like a Linux distribution we all know and love. :)
Running Gentoo in production has been a competitive advantage for us.
Need tomcat installed? Here it is. Need PHP5? Here it is. Need XML
nonsense in PHP? Here it is. Need a Mysql driven virtual mail system?
Here it is. At the time to do the above on most stable or enterprise
systems would have involved waiting for the packages I wanted to be
releases 12-18 months after the fact or becoming a dev. Neither are a
great use of my time. I'll take a few thousand random Gentoo users
posting on the forums over a QA department of just me. So rather than
see Gentoo think about doing or not doing enterprise type stuff like
long releases, support contracts, etc I think most of us LAMP, MRTG,
Nagios, BIND, Postfix, Qmail, Postgres, thttpd, Courier, etc geeks would
like "just a bit more stability" rather than the overhead that comes
with enterprise features.
Some people really like the idea of snapshots. I'm not completely sold
on it, but would find it interesting if it were 6 month snapshots or
less. I like the idea of meta builds. I'd be even more interested in
snapshotting only the meta build rather than the whole OS. The mail
server stays stable, but the rest updates as normal... I'm sure that
idea will turn out to have significant drawbacks. Reverse dependency
checking... been discussed to death and we all know it's coming. Once
it's working well that's going to eliminate a number of problems
especially if it'll warn you at the emerge -upv level that some updates
are going to require a revdep-rebuild rather than after the fact.
To be honest /etc/portage/* tends be enough control for me, but I've
been doing admin work for 9 years. And I've got a test environment that
I use religiously. I do however answer a lot of questions in the Network
and Security forum where up and coming admins aren't so lucky. I don't
think any of us expect a foolproof system, but there is room for a bit
more stability that'll benefit all users... especially admins. :)
Hopefully this sparks some more interesting debate.
kashani
--
[email protected] mailing list
