On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 05:45:26PM -0700, Duncan wrote: > Lance Albertson posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted > below, on Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:14:11 -0500: > > > Ok, after talking with a few folks I want to retract my comment about no > > shell access. I didn't think about the other groups (docs) that already > > have shell access and retain a simliar status as forum mods do in > > Gentoo. I'm just getting ansty about all these new people we're bringing > > on and the security behind it. Thats my main concern at this point, not > > whether your work is more or less than a regular developer. I just > > wanted to make that point before I had a flamewar directed at me :) > > OK, I'm with you on the security thing (being one that would prefer a > USE=clientonly flag, remember, tho I understand the reasons behind not > doing it), but I DO know there's quite the occasional use for someplace to > host scripts, patchlets, and sample config files for reference from > forums/news/lists/irc, that I've personally found useful, that others > would like to see as well.
Would devwiki (or something like that) access for hosting files be acceptable? Seriously security_wise and admin_wise I don't see shell access useful neither appropriate imho. Btw how many forums moderators are we talking about? Cheers -- Andrea Barisani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> .*. Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Developer V ( ) GPG-Key 0x864C9B9E http://dev.gentoo.org/~lcars/pubkey.asc ( ) 0A76 074A 02CD E989 CE7F AC3F DA47 578E 864C 9B9E ^^_^^ "Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate" -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list