On Friday 01 July 2005 03:55 am, Chris Bainbridge wrote: > > Why not just use =qt-3.3 since qt3 probably wont have any new major > > release ? > > This would seem like the easiest option. Is there any reason not to do > it this way?
Yes, two of them. 1. You don't know that there won't be a 3.4 qt 2. You'll force a user to upgrade to qt 3.3 if they attempt to install any package that depends on Qt. Speaking from personal experience, I still have some servers using Qt 3.1 because I have programs running 24/7 that rely on Qt and simply cannot be upgraded right now. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
