On Sat, 2 Jul 2005 00:00:38 +0300 Dan Armak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 01 July 2005 23:19, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > > It also makes any attempts to parse ebuilds without using bash (our > > current strategy) a lot harder (actually causing bash > > reimplementation) > You mean you're actually doing that for portage-cvs? I didn't know > that. Does 'our current strategy' refer to using bash or to not using > it? He doesn't. Portage-cvs (=2.1) still uses bash and there are no plans to change that for the ebuild format. However we _might_ add support for alternate package formats in the future. Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
pgpRElbs2fscL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
