-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stephen P. Becker wrote: > Clearly, you either chose to blatantly ignore, or completely > misunderstood what avenj was saying. What he *meant* was we don't have > the time or manpower to have developers take significant portions of > their valuable time to do what you suggest without paying somebody to do it. >
No, I didn't blatantly ignore or misunderstand Jon. The ;) was meant to imply humor, but I am the first to admit that email isn't the best medium for that sort of thing. But as far as the manpower thing goes, it is obviously a good and valid point. Please read my last response to Ciaran on that topic. Nathan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCz/lM2QTTR4CNEQARAkoIAJ9EnB8nzHNSOIfJ5OW42bgNftvs0gCfbOkv bcYnd7C9s0np/5SmY+iwzQE= =i6xI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [email protected] mailing list
