On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 20:22:29 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 16 July 2005 01:03 pm, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 21:34:09 -0400
> >
> > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > we could care less what users do with /etc/profile.d ... the
> > > point is that *only* users should use /etc/profile.d ... we dont
> > > want random Gentoo developer Foo installing some Bar.sh
> > > into /etc/profile.d with package app-crap/FooBar
> >
> > Would the following in /et/profile be a solution to this problem?
> >
> > for x in $( < /etc/profile.d/.default); do
> > source "/etc/profile.d/${x}"
> > done
> >
> > That way devs could install stuff there, but it would only be run if
> > users added it to the .default file.
>
> that kind of limits the intuitiveness of profile.d ... plus, not like
> they couldnt just do 'echo blah >> /etc/profile.d/.default' at the
> end of pkg_postinst or something
They could do the same to /etc/profile, no?
Marius
--
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
pgpdM3xx6eolf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
